Home

Masthead

Dispatches

Comment & Culture

Politics

OTR Columns

Chronicles
Doghead
Idle Chatter
American Notes

Highly Recommended

Daupo
3QuarksDaily
Harper's Index

Arts and Letters Daily
Dissent
The Believer
London Review of Books
NY Review of Books

Al Bab: Arabic Media
Juan Cole
The Nation
Anti-Imperialist Essays
Bookforum
Style.org
Al Jazeera
Al Jadid

Sistani Online

North Korea Site
CIA Studies
MEMRI

Baghdad Burning
Wind Up The Vitriola!
Dar al hayat
Small Spiral Notebook
Media Channel
Powell's Book-A-Day

Support OTR

OTR Category - March, 2004


Osama

Emily Mitchell

Siddiq Barmak's new film Osama is rendered in the broad strokes of a parable. Like the films of Abbas Kiarostami and Bahman Ghobadi, Barmak uses a story about children to tell us about an entire culture and to emphasize the restrictions on the lives of his characters, the fact that the difficulties they face are not of their own making. Osama, however, lacks some of the marvelous subtlety of recent Iranian cinema. The film is a response to a crisis and as such, it wears its message on its sleeve. At first glance, this seems to diminish its emotional impact.

Set in Kabul in the mid-1990s when the Taleban was consolidating its power over the Afghan capital, the film opens with a mother and daughter caught up by accident in a street protest of women who have been denied the right to work by the new regime. The Taleban arrive in their hallmark Toyota pickups to break up the protest with water cannons, and the images of hundreds of identical burqua-clad figures fleeing and falling in the muddy street are shot in harrowing slow motion. Women are trampled and herded into chicken coops. The scene feels weighed down by the symbolism it is meant to contain, though it is difficult to tell whether this burden will lighten or increase over time, as the reality of the setting becomes less immediate, raw and painful for future viewers.

Other incidents follow which have this same unnerving allegorical sense: after the hospital where her mother works is closed, the film's young heroine (whose real name we never learn) is sent out to find employment, disguised as a boy. As the girl's hair is cut against her will, her grandmother tells a story about a boy who was changed into a girl by walking under a rainbow. When her head is shorn, the girl plants her severed braid in a pot of earth, as though it were a flower. These details feel incongruous, too precious for their context. As she works in the shop of a friend of her martyred father, she draws a stick figure in a skirt with long hair and skirt on the condensation on the window, and the store owner catches her skipping rope in the back store room. This is a child whose childhood is being stolen from her, and it is writ large in these moments.

As the story develops, however, the fairy-tale simplicity begins to work to the film's advantage. For one thing, the up-close focus and the measured pacing of the cinematography force the viewer to experience the ordinariness of life under the Taleban. What we find is not so much the banality of their form of evil as its minutiae, the fact that it was the work of people who looked their victims in the face and still prosecuted an agenda that denied their humanity. The Taleban were maniacally concerned with details as small as a woman's bared ankles. Remarkably, both their cruelty and their morality come across. The film is also concerned with the boundaries placed on physical space, the way that human beings hem themselves in or are confined by others, and it takes time over the business of entering and leaving rooms, arrivals and departures. It shows the horror at ground level, and as such it is valuable especially to audiences far away from Afghanistan for whom the country has itself become an evolving symbol but remains a virtual unknown in its actuality.

The world we are shown has had simplified meaning imposed on it; the teachings that underpin the Taleban’s version of Islam allow for no variation in behavior, dress, gender-roles or religious practice. Women must all look alike, and so must men. This is a rigidly ordered society and heterogeneity is the ultimate threat to it. Hence, when the girl is sent to a school for boys, she finds herself required to dress, play, study – and, finally, bathe – in sync with the others. It is the fact that she stands out that causes her problems, and she gets her moniker when her one friend, a street orphan named Eschandi, tries to protect her by giving her the name of the sainted Osama bin Laden. It is a vain attempt to make her the part of something, the same as the others. Finally, the symbolism adds to the almost unbearable pathos of the ending. The story moves towards what can only be described as a diabolical inversion of a standard romantic ending.

Osama is an important film for a number of reasons, not least because it is the first film to be made in Afghanistan in the post-Taleban era. It is an attempt to grapple with the past, with the effects of zealotry, and it doesn’t turn away from the final implications of a philosophy that attempts to control absolutely the lives of women and girls. It is an indictment of the human tendency to judge based on preordained categories. It demands instead that we engage with what is different about each person, whether they are Taleban mullahs or young girls, and that we face how that uniqueness is destroyed.

Emily Mitchell is an OTR Contributing Editor.

 

Subscribe to OTR via free email newsletter - click here to learn more.
The exact address of this page: http://www.fluxfactory.org/otr/mitchellosama.htm